West Texas Rangelands
West Texas RangelandsWe hope to provide a variety of science-based rangeland information and current research on prescribed fire, wildfires, brush management, and grazing management!

Economic Incentives for Reducing Wildfire Risk

by

What Landowners, Educators, and Technical Assistance Providers Should Know
Wildfire risk across Texas rangelands and working lands continues to rise. Larger fires, longer fire seasons, and increased exposure at the wildland–urban interface are no longer isolated concerns, they are becoming part of routine land management decisions. While traditional wildfire response has focused heavily on suppression, growing attention is being given to prevention and risk reduction, particularly through economic incentives that encourage proactive land stewardship.  Recent research examining economic incentives for reducing wildfire risk highlights both opportunities and challenges for landowners and those who support them through education and technical assistance.

Why Wildfire Risk Is Increasing
Several interacting forces are driving higher wildfire risk on rangelands:

  • Climate and weather variability, including hotter temperatures and more frequent droughts
  • Fuel buildup from invasive grasses, brush encroachment, and reduced disturbance
  • Land use change and fragmentation, which complicates coordinated fire management

The social and economic impacts extend beyond burned acres. Wildfires affect ranch operations, infrastructure, natural resources, insurance markets, and community safety. As a result, there is growing interest in tools that shift investments from post-fire response to pre-fire prevention.

What Are Economic Incentives for Wildfire Risk Reduction?
Economic incentives are mechanisms designed to lower the financial barriers to adopting wildfire-mitigating practices or to reward landowners for reducing risk on their properties. The research summarized in the infographic identifies four broad categories of incentives:

  1. Command-and-Control Policies – These include regulations such as burn bans, fuel treatment requirements, or zoning rules. While they can be effective in certain contexts, they often face resistance if they limit landowner flexibility or fail to account for local conditions.
  2. Information-Based Incentives – Programs such as cost-share education, outreach campaigns, and technical guidance aim to increase awareness and capacity. These approaches are common in Extension programming and are most effective when paired with financial or operational support.
  3. Market-Based Incentives
    • Cost-share programs for prescribed burning, brush management, or grazing infrastructure
    • Payments for ecosystem services
    • Insurance premium adjustments tied to risk reduction
    • Research shows that direct subsidies and cost-share programs are among the most frequently used and most studied incentive types for wildfire risk reduction.
  4. Hybrid Incentives – Hybrid approaches combine regulatory frameworks with market or informational tools. For example, insurance programs that reward compliance with fuel management standards.

Cost, Effectiveness, and Tradeoffs
One of the most important takeaways for landowners and advisors is that upfront investment matters, but long-term savings can be substantial.

  • Prescribed burning, targeted grazing, and mechanical treatments require planning and initial costs.
  • Over time, these practices can reduce wildfire suppression costs, limit infrastructure damage, and improve ecological resilience.
  • Studies summarized in the research indicate that prevention investments can yield significant cost savings compared to repeated emergency response and recovery.

However, challenges remain:

  • Incentive programs are often short-term, while wildfire risk reduction requires sustained management.
  • Programs may not align well with local ecological conditions or landowner objectives.
  • Participation can be limited by administrative burden or lack of technical support.

Implications for Extension and Technical Assistance
For Extension educators and technical assistance providers, the findings reinforce several key points:

  • Cultural context matters. Landowners are more likely to engage when incentives align with local norms, production goals, and stewardship values.
  • One-size-fits-all approaches rarely work. Flexible, locally adapted programs outperform rigid designs.
  • Education alone is not enough. Information is most effective when paired with financial or operational incentives that reduce risk and uncertainty for landowners.

Extension’s trusted role positions educators to:

  • Translate incentive opportunities into practical decision tools
  • Facilitate cooperative approaches across fence lines
  • Support landowners in navigating cost-share, insurance, and hybrid programs

Looking Ahead
As wildfire risk continues to shape rangeland management, future incentive programs are likely to place greater emphasis on:

  • Long-term contracts and sustained funding
  • Risk-based insurance models
  • Integrated approaches that combine grazing management, prescribed fire, and fuel reduction

For landowners, proactive participation in wildfire risk reduction can protect livelihoods, landscapes, and communities. For educators and technical assistance providers, aligning economic incentives with sound land management remains a powerful strategy for building more fire-resilient rangelands.

Learn More and Stay Connected
For additional resources on rangeland fire management, prescribed burning, and incentive programs, contact your local Extension office or rangeland specialist.

Fire Field Day – Mason, Tx: A Hands-On Learning Experience for Landowners

by

Landowners, ranchers, and natural resource managers across the region are invited to take part in an exciting and educational Fire Field Day.  The event is slated for March 21, 2026, at the scenic White Ranch in Mason, Texas. This in-person workshop offers a unique opportunity to learn directly from prescribed fire experts and the Central Basin Prescribed Burn Association (PBA).

With growiA promotional flyer for a “Fire Field Day” event in Mason, Texas, featuring a background photo of an active grass fire with flames and smoke. Event details include date, time, location at White Ranch, and host information. The flyer highlights topics such as prescribed burning, brushpile burning, fire management objectives, regulations, and safe techniques. It notes lunch is provided, the event is free, CEUs are available, and participants may observe a live demonstration. A registration link is included at the bottom.ng interest in safe and effective rangeland management practices, prescribed fire has become an essential tool for improving rangeland health, reducing wildfire risk, and managing brush and tree encroachment. This event is designed to equip participants with both foundational knowledge and practical, hands-on experience.

What to Expect at Fire Field Day
The workshop runs from 8:30am to 2:00pm, and lunch will be provided at no cost to attendees. The day includes expert-led discussions and demonstrations focusing on:

⭐ Fire Management Objectives
Learn why fire is such an effective ecological tool, how it benefits rangelands, and what outcomes you can expect when applying prescribed burning on your property.

⭐ Laws and Regulations
Prescribed fire is a powerful tool that comes with responsibilities. Attendees will gain clarity on Texas laws governing burn plans, permitting, liability, and proper safety protocols.

⭐ Safe Fire Techniques for Your Property
From ignition methods to firebreak preparation, participants will walk away with practical strategies they can apply at home.

Weather permitting, the event will also feature a live prescribed fire or brushpile burn demonstration, giving attendees a chance to observe fire behavior and management techniques in real time.

This Fire Field Day is proudly hosted by the Central Basin Prescribed Burn Association, with support from Texas A&M AgriLife Extension and the Prescribed Burn Alliance of Texas. These organizations are committed to helping landowners apply safe, science-based fire practices to improve their rangeland and encourage healthier ecosystems across the region.

Why Prescribed Fire Matters
Prescribed burning is one of the most cost-effective and natural methods for managing unwanted brush and trees, improving wildlife habitat, stimulating new plant growth, and reducing the intensity of future wildfires. For many Texas landowners, gaining confidence and practical knowledge is the key first step toward implementing burns on their own property.

This workshop is an ideal starting point, whether you are brand new to prescribed fire or looking to expand your experience with support from certified professionals.

We hope you will mark your calendar and JOIN US!
📍 Location: White Ranch – 15071 Ranch Road 1871, Mason, TX
📅 Date: March 21, 2026
⏰ Time: 8:30 AM–2:00 PM
💲 Cost: FREE
🍽️ Lunch Included
📜 CEU’s Available

For more information and to register please visit: TX.AG/MASONFIREFIELDDAY
Spaces often fill quickly for hands-on burn workshops so don’t miss this chance to learn from experts and connect with landowners across the region.

Stay Connected with Us!
Follow along for more land management events, educational workshops, and updates across the region.

The Long-Term Cost of Overgrazing—and How to Avoid It

by

Rangeland health is shaped by cumulative management decisions rather than single events. Grazing practices that consider timing, recovery, and monitoring support long-term productivity and resilience.

Avoiding overgrazing requires consistency, observation, and flexibility. Just as our environmental conditions change (whiplash drought), so must our grazing strategies.

Connecting the Pieces

Understanding overgrazing, reading rangeland condition, and applying recovery-based grazing strategies work together. Each piece informs the next, creating a management approach that responds to what rangeland needs.

When these elements are aligned, rangelands are better equipped to handle drought, variable weather, fires, woody plant encroachment, and changing conditions.

Long-Term Benefits of Intentional Grazing

Over time, well-managed grazing supports stronger plant communities, improved soil cover, and greater forage stability. These benefits accumulate gradually, reinforcing the importance of patience and long-term thinking.

Stewardship Over Short-Term Gains

Successful rangeland management prioritizes sustainability over short-term use. Grazing decisions made with long-term outcomes in mind help ensure rangelands remain productive and functional for future generations. These strategies also create more flexibility across the operation because pastures are kept productive, healthy, and ready for the next grazing rotation despite challenging environmental conditions.

What Long-Term Success Looks Like on Rangeland

Long-term rangeland success is not defined by a single good year, but by consistent patterns over time. Healthy rangelands tend to show stable plant communities, adequate ground cover, and the ability to recover after grazing or environmental stress.

Successful grazing systems remain flexible. Stocking rates, timing, and pasture use are adjusted based on current conditions rather than fixed plans or continuous use. Monitoring becomes a regular habit, allowing managers to respond early instead of reacting after damage has occurred.

Over time, this approach supports more reliable forage production, improved soil protection, and greater resilience during drought and variable weather. Long-term success is built through intentional decisions made season after season, with the rangeland guiding every single management choice.

Grazing Isn’t the Problem. Unmanaged Pressure Is.

by

Grazing is often viewed as a disturbance or impediment to rangeland health, but it is just the opposite! When applied intentionally, it can support plant diversity and ecosystem function. The key is managing pressure, timing, and recovery rather than applying constant use in a continuous grazing system.  Even if managers are conservatively or low-stocked, continuous grazing is a recipe for poor rangeland condition.  

Grazing strategies that prioritize rest allow plants to recover and strengthen root systems. 

Rest and Recovery Matter 

Plants need time after grazing to regrow leaves and rebuild energy reserves that sustains populations during drought and dormancy. Without sufficient recovery, repeated grazing weakens native perennial grasses and reduces long-term productivity and diversity. 

Planned grazing systems incorporate rest periods that match plant growth patterns and environmental conditions. 

Managing Pressure, Not Just Numbers 

Stocking rate alone does not determine grazing success. Duration and distribution of grazing pressure often have a greater impact on plant health than animal numbers. 

Adjusting pasture size, rotation timing, and water placement can help distribute grazing pressure more evenly across the landscape. 

Grazing as a Management Tool 

When managed properly, grazing can reduce excess vegetation, promote plant diversity, and support soil health. Used intentionally, livestock become a win-win synergistic balance that contributes to rangeland resilience rather than degradation. 

When Does Grazing Become Overgrazing?

by

Overgrazing is often attributed to having too many animals in the pasture. In reality, overgrazing is less about the number of livestock and more about how long plants are consistently exposed to grazing pressure. On West Texas rangelands, the timing and duration of grazing and rest from grazing play a much larger role in native, perennial grass health than simple stocking numbers. 

Understanding what overgrazing actually looks like is the first step toward preventing long-term damage and supporting resilient rangeland systems. 

What Is Overgrazing? 

Overgrazing occurs when plants are grazed repeatedly without adequate time to recover. A pasture can be overgrazed even with a small number of animals if those animals remain in one area too long. When plants are repeatedly defoliated (grazed), they lose the ability to regrow effectively and rebuild root systems, steadily shrinking in mass and function. 

Functioning rangelands depend on periods of rest. Without recovery time from grazing, plant vigor declines, soil cover decreases, and erosion risk and bare ground increases. 

Overgrazing vs. Heavy Grazing 

Heavy grazing and overgrazing are not the same thing. Heavy grazing refers to short-term use where plants are grazed intensively but then allowed time to recover. Overgrazing happens when grazing pressure continues without rest, and plants are repeatedly defoliated.  

This distinction is important because grazing can be used as a management tool when paired with recovery. Problems arise when grazing pressure is constant rather than planned and rotated. 

Early Signs of Overgrazing 

Early indicators of overgrazing include reduced plant height, loss of preferred forage species, and increasing bare ground. Over time, these changes can lead to reduced forage production and increased weed or invasive species presence- including woody species establishment like honey mesquite and redberry juniper 

Monitoring these early signals from your rangeland grasses should spur managers to adjust grazing before long-term and irrecoverable damage occurs. 

 

High-Energy Fire Significantly Improves Honey Mesquite Control: Key Findings from a 2022 Texas Study

by

A new(er) peer-reviewed study published in the Journal of Environmental Management (Starns et al., 2022) provides some of the strongest experimental evidence to date that fire intensity—not just the presence of fire—is the critical factor in achieving meaningful mortality of honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa).

For decades, land managers in Texas, Oklahoma, and across the southern Great Plains have observed that typical “safe” prescribed fires top-kill mesquite but rarely kill it. The plant simply resprouts vigorously from protected buds beneath the bark (epicormic) and at the root crown (basal). This resilience has made prescribed fire alone an unreliable tool for restoring grass-dominated rangeland once mesquite has become dominant.

The 2022 study directly tested whether dramatically increasing fire energy could overcome those protective mechanisms—even without the added stress of severe drought.

Study Design (Sonora, Texas – 2018–2020)

  • 48 similar-sized honey mesquite trees were selected.
  • Plots received either:
    • Low-energy fire (≈10,000 kJ/m²) – representative of standard prescribed burns using grass/hay fuel, or
    • High-energy fire (≈105,000 kJ/m²) – created by adding cut redberry juniper as fuel to produce prolonged, intense heat.
  • Half the trees in each fire treatment had soil removed from the root crown to test the importance of soil as a bud shield.
  • Trees were monitored for survival and resprouting (basal and epicormic) for two full growing seasons.

Major Results Every Land Manager Should Know

  1. 100% survival after low-energy fire Every mesquite exposed to low-energy fire resprouted and survived the 2-year study period.
  2. 29% apparent mortality after high-energy fire Seven of the 24 mesquites subjected to high-energy fire produced no live resprouts after two growing seasons—an unprecedented kill rate in a controlled experiment without drought stress.
  3. Epicormic (trunk) sprouting virtually eliminated Low-energy fires triggered abundant trunk sprouting (often >100 shoots per tree). High-energy fires almost completely prevented epicormic resprouting—only one tree produced any trunk shoots.
  4. Fewer basal resprouts with high-energy fire Although basal buds (protected by soil) were more heat-tolerant, high-energy fires still reduced the number of basal resprouts by roughly 50–70% in the first post-fire year compared with low-energy fires.
  5. Root-crown exposure helped in year one, but effect faded Excavating soil from the base reduced resprouting the first season, but by year two the difference disappeared.
  6. Results achieved under normal-to-wet conditions The burns were conducted during moderate soil moisture and were followed by above-average rainfall. This demonstrates that extreme fire energy alone—not plant water stress from drought—can significantly impair mesquite recovery.

Practical Implications for Ranchers and Prescribed-Fire Practitioners

  • Standard low-intensity prescribed fire remains largely ineffective for reducing mesquite density or canopy cover.
  • To achieve meaningful mortality, fires must deliver sustained high heat to the cambium and bud zone for several minutes. This typically requires substantial woody fuel loading (e.g., scattered juniper, brush piles, or heavy dead mesquite stems) and weather conditions that support fire spread.
  • Adding targeted woody fuel around individual mesquites or in patches is a practical way to create localized “high-energy” zones even on days when broader landscape conditions are moderate.
  • While complete stand replacement with a single fire is still unlikely, repeated high-energy fires over time—especially when residual dead stems remain standing—should progressively increase cumulative mortality.

In short, the study confirms what many experienced burn practitioners have long suspected: when the goal is mesquite control rather than simple top-kill, hotter is unequivocally better.

Citation: Starns, H.D., Wonkka, C.L., Dickinson, M.B., et al. 2022. Prosopis glandulosa persistence is facilitated by differential protection of buds during low- and high-energy fires. Journal of Environmental Management 303: 114141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114141. Feel free to download a pdf file here!

Safe, effective, and sufficiently intense prescribed fire can be a game-changing tool for restoring grass dominance in mesquite-invaded rangelands. This research gives us the science to justify turning up the heat!!

Prickly Pear and the South American Cactus Moth

by

Cactus Moth InfographicTexas is known for its rugged landscapes and iconic, opportunistic, and problematic prickly pear. While these plants readily provide headaches to the grazing manager, oftentimes pear also serves as food and habitat for wildlife and is a native species on Texas rangelands. However, the South American Cactus Moth has been found and confirmed in five Texas counties. 

[Read more…] about Prickly Pear and the South American Cactus Moth

Non-Target Woody Plant Response to Herbicides

by

Ranchers in West Texas frequently encounter a double-decker challenge with intense canopy coverage from honey mesquite and dense pricklypear in the understory. Synergistic broadcast herbicide applications are commonly employed to tackle these layered problematic, opportunistic, and abundant species. However, it is crucial to recognize the potential for unintended consequences on nontarget woody plant species. A recent study delved into the effects of various herbicide treatments on both target and nontarget woody plant species.

[Read more…] about Non-Target Woody Plant Response to Herbicides

Patch Burn Grazing: An Economic Analysis of Pyric Herbivory Rangeland Management by Cow-Calf Producers

by

Patch-burn grazing is a practice that requires an understanding of the interaction of fire and grazing (pyric herbivory) (for more information check out www.theprairieproject.org). It divides a pasture into pieces/patches, with one burn rotationally each year. It helps control woody plant encroachment and provides high-quality forages. Despite these known benefits, the adoption of this practice by ranchers has been slow and limited. This study focused on the benefits of patch-burn grazing by estimating the costs and long-term economic benefits. Additionally, researchers compared patch-burning to traditional applications of prescribed fire burning fenceline to fenceline or an entire pasture at once with a 3-year fire return interval. 

[Read more…] about Patch Burn Grazing: An Economic Analysis of Pyric Herbivory Rangeland Management by Cow-Calf Producers