-
-
American Bar Association Web 100 Honoree
-
Texas Bar Today Top 10 Blog Posts
-
Tenth Anniversary Edition 100 BLAWG Honoree
-
Top 100 Blawg Winner 2015!
-
Top 100 Blawg Winner 2014!
-
View by Category
- "Ag Gag" Statutes
- AALA Conference
- Adverse Possession
- AQHA Cloning Lawsuit
- Big Data
- Business Entity Selection
- Carbon Contracts
- Checkoff Program Challenges
- Clean Water Act
- Contracts
- Dicamba
- Direct Beef Sales
- Dispute Resolution
- Drones
- Easements
- Eminent Domain
- Eminent Domain in Texas Series
- Employment/Labor Law
- Endangered Species Act
- Estate Planning
- Extension Publications
- Farm Animal Liability Act
- Farm Bill
- Federal Regulations
- Fence Law
- FOIA/PIA
- Food Safety
- Free Ag Law Resources
- GMO Labeling
- GMO Labeling and Reporting
- Greenwashing
- Hemp
- Horse Slaughter
- Immigration
- Insurance
- Land Values
- Landowner Liability
- Leases
- Lesser Prairie Chicken
- Lessons from My Agricultural Law Course
- Liens
- Local Fracking Bans
- Mental Health
- Oil and Gas Law
- Pesticide Drift
- Podcast
- Prescribed Burning
- Property Taxes
- Purchasing Property
- Questions from Tiffany's Desk
- Regulatory Takings
- Right to Farm laws
- SCOTUS Watch
- Seed Law
- Solar
- Special Use Valuation
- Surface Use Agreements
- Syngenta Litigation
- Tax Issues
- Texas Legislature
- Texas Supreme Court Decisions
- Texas Water Wars
- Transition Planning
- Uncategorized
- Undercover Video Situations
- United States Congress
- United States Supreme Court Decisions
- USDA Programs
- Water Law
- Water Pipeline Projects
- Weekly Round Up
- Wildfire
- Wind Energy Leasing
- WOTUS
- Year in Review
-
Archives
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
Category Archives: United States Supreme Court Decisions
United States Supreme Court Allows Proposition 12 to Stand
The United States Supreme Court has ruled in a closely watched agricultural law case involving California’s Proposition 12. [Read Opinion here.] Background In 2018, California voters passed Proposition 12 (“Prop 12”), a ballot initiative setting production standards for eggs, veal, and pork sold in California. Relevant in this case, Prop 12 prohibited the sale of whole pork meat from breeding pigs or their immediate offspring that were “confined in a cruel manner.” “Cruel” conditions were defined as a pig being unable to lie down, stand up, fully extend… Read More →
October 14, 2022 Weekly Round Up
Happy Friday! It has been a busy couple of weeks in the ag law world. *US Supreme Court hears oral argument in two key cases. The US Supreme Court heard oral argument in two key ag-related cases. First, on October 3, 2022, the Justices heard argument in Sackett v. EPA, a case looking at the proper test for determining whether a wetland is considered a “water of the United States” under the Clean Water Act. [Read more here.] To listen to the recording of this argument or read the… Read More →
US Supreme Court Will Hear Proposition 12 Challenge
On March 28, the United States Supreme Court granted the petition for certiorari in National Pork Producers v. Ross, a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of California’s Proposition 12 (Prop 12). To hear more about animal confinement statutes generally and Prop 12 specifically, click here for a podcast episode I did with Beth Rumley from the National Agricultural Law Center. Background Prop 12, passed by California voters in 2018, makes it illegal to sell pork in California unless the pig from which it comes was born to a sow housed… Read More →
2021 Ag Law Year in Review – National
Happy 2022! As we do each year, we’ve compiled our list of some of the biggest agricultural law stories in 2021. Today, we will take a look at this from the national level. Next week, we will take a look at Texas-specific issues. To hear Paul Goeringer and I discuss the biggest issues of 2021, click here to listen to our year-end episode of the Ag Law in the Field Podcast. Waters of the United States If there has been one constant over the last 5 years, it… Read More →
United States Supreme Court Dismisses Mississippi v. Tennessee Groundwater Lawsuit
The United States Supreme Court recently issued a unanimous opinion in an ongoing groundwater dispute between Mississippi and Tennessee. [Read Opinion here.] I wrote a blog post detailing this decision for the National Agricultural Law Center. To read my summary of the dispute, description of the Opinion, and thoughts about what this means from here, just click here to read that post.
December 3, 2021 Weekly Round Up
Happy December! There has been a lot of agricultural law news over the past few weeks, so here are some of the biggest stories impacting agriculture. *Texas Supreme Court denied petition for review in Lyle v. Midway Solar. Earlier this year, the El Paso Court of Appeals dismissed a lawsuit filed by mineral owners against a solar company for building a solar farm on the property. The court held that the accommodation doctrine would apply, but that because the mineral owner had not sought to actually develop the minerals,… Read More →
July 2, 2021 Weekly Round Up
It has been a busy couple of weeks in the agricultural law world. Here’s a recap of some of the biggest stories. * Texas Supreme Court will not hear Texas Central Railway eminent domain case. The Texas Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal in Miles v. Texas Central Railroad & Infrastructure. This denial leaves in place the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals ruling that Texas Central is considered a “railroad company” and an “interurban railroad,” thereby giving it eminent domain power to condemn land for the high… Read More →
US Supreme Court Sides with Agricultural Employers in Takings Case
Last week, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, a case involving a California law requiring agricultural employers to allow union organizers to enter the employer’s property. The employers claimed this was a taking of private property without just compensation, and the US Supreme Court agreed. [Read Opinion here.] Background California law gives agricultural employees the right to self-organization and prohibits employers from interfering with that right. The California Agricultural Labor Relations Board (CALRB) passed a regulation that requires labor organizations to… Read More →
SCOTUS Rules for Georgia in Water Dispute with Florida
The United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision on April 1, 2021, ending a water dispute between Florida and Georgia. Background Florida filed an original suit against Georgia in 2013 claiming that Georgia consumes more than its fair share of water from the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin (“ACF”). The basin consists of three rivers: the Flint, the Chattahoochee, and the Apalachicola. Both the Flint and Chattahoochee Rivers start in Georgia and empty into Lake Seminole, which sits on the Florida/Georgia border. Both are critical water sources for Georgia,… Read More →
US Supreme Court Dismisses Texas Petition for Review in Pecos River Dispute
In December, the US Supreme Court issued an opinion in Texas v. New Mexico, a water law dispute involving the Pecos River. The Compact The Pecos river runs from the Sangre de Cristo Mountains near Santa Fe, New Mexico through New Mexico and Texas and eventually into the Rio Grande River at the Texas-Mexico border near Del Rio, Texas. In 1949, Texas and New Mexico signed the Pecos River Compact, and Congress ratified the Compact. The Compact provides for the “equitable division and apportionment of the use of… Read More →