-
-
American Bar Association Web 100 Honoree
-
Texas Bar Today Top 10 Blog Posts
-
Tenth Anniversary Edition 100 BLAWG Honoree
-
Top 100 Blawg Winner 2015!
-
Top 100 Blawg Winner 2014!
-
View by Category
- "Ag Gag" Statutes
- AALA Conference
- Adverse Possession
- AQHA Cloning Lawsuit
- Big Data
- Business Entity Selection
- Carbon Contracts
- Checkoff Program Challenges
- Clean Water Act
- Contracts
- Dicamba
- Direct Beef Sales
- Dispute Resolution
- Drones
- Easements
- Eminent Domain
- Eminent Domain in Texas Series
- Employment/Labor Law
- Endangered Species Act
- Estate Planning
- Extension Publications
- Farm Animal Liability Act
- Farm Bill
- Federal Regulations
- Fence Law
- FOIA/PIA
- Food Safety
- Free Ag Law Resources
- GMO Labeling
- GMO Labeling and Reporting
- Greenwashing
- Hemp
- Horse Slaughter
- Immigration
- Insurance
- Land Values
- Landowner Liability
- Leases
- Lesser Prairie Chicken
- Lessons from My Agricultural Law Course
- Liens
- Local Fracking Bans
- Mental Health
- Oil and Gas Law
- Pesticide Drift
- Podcast
- Prescribed Burning
- Property Taxes
- Purchasing Property
- Questions from Tiffany's Desk
- Regulatory Takings
- Right to Farm laws
- SCOTUS Watch
- Seed Law
- Solar
- Special Use Valuation
- Surface Use Agreements
- Syngenta Litigation
- Tax Issues
- Texas Legislature
- Texas Supreme Court Decisions
- Texas Water Wars
- Transition Planning
- Uncategorized
- Undercover Video Situations
- United States Congress
- United States Supreme Court Decisions
- USDA Programs
- Water Law
- Water Pipeline Projects
- Weekly Round Up
- Wildfire
- Wind Energy Leasing
- WOTUS
- Year in Review
-
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
Category Archives: Oil and Gas Law
Texas Oil & Gas Law: When 1/2 of 1/8 Not Equal 1/16
The Texas Supreme Court recently issued a ruling in Van Dyke v. The Navigator Group, an interesting case involving the use of double fractions in historic oil and gas documents. [Read Opinion here.] As the Court noted to open its opinion, “Only in a legal context could the formula ‘one-half of one-eighth’ mean anything other than one-sixteenth.” Background In 1924, the Mulkeys conveyed their ranch and the underlying minerals to White & Tom with the following reservation: It is understood and agreed that one-half of one-eighth of all minerals… Read More →
2022 Ag Law Year in Review – Texas
Each year, I am surprised by the number of agricultural law developments across Texas. This year is no exception, and I believe it may be the biggest year for agricultural law that I can remember in the Lone Star state. If you missed our review of the biggest ag law stories on the national level, click here. High Speed Rail Has Eminent Domain Authority The Texas Supreme Court issued a divided opinion in Miles v. Texas Central Railroad & Infrastructure holding that Texas Central Railroad has the power… Read More →
June 10, 2022 Weekly Round Up
It’s been a bit since our last Weekly Round Up post, but we’re back! Part of the reason for the delay was a recent trip I took with my family to the Nugget All-American sheep show and sale in Reno, NV. Because I’m a mom and bragging on our kids is what we do, I’m happy to report that both kiddos won banners. Braun’s lamb was Reserve Supreme Champion Wether and Champion Dorset Wether and Harper’s lamb was Reserve Speck Wether. My family also raised the Reserve Supreme… Read More →
Eastland Court of Appeals Rules Oil Company Not Liable for Dead Cows
When over 100 cattle died after exposure from oil and saltwater from oil and gas operations, their owner sued the oil company. The Eastland Court of Appeals affirmed a take nothing judgment and dismissal in Foote v. Texcel Exploration, Inc. Background Mr. Foote leased property in Knox County, Texas on which he grazed 650 head of cows. He hired Mr. Cypert to care for the cattle on the lease. Foote traveled to Knox County, met with Cypert, and went to look at Cypert’s facilities and operations. Foote did not… Read More →
August 13, 2021 Weekly Round Up
It is time for another recap of some of the key agricultural law stories in the news over the past couple of weeks. * Court orders Maui County to obtain NPDES permit for injection wells on remand. You all likely remember the US Supreme Court decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, in which the US Supreme Court held that NPDES permits are required for both direct discharges into waters of the United States and for indirect discharges that are the functional equivalent of a direct… Read More →
Texas Supreme Court Addresses Postproduction Costs
A recent Texas Supreme Court case, BlueStone Natural Resources II, LLC v. Randle, addressed a dispute over postproduction cost allocation for royalties. I thought this Opinion offered a good explanation of postproduction costs generally, and comparison of the two clauses at issue in the leases, which made it worth taking a look at on this blog. [Read Opinion here.] Background In 2003, several mineral owners (“lessors”) executed oil and gas leases with Quicksilver Resources. Each of the leases contain a 2-page Printed Lease and an attached Addendum. The… Read More →
Case Addresses Mineral Reservation Language Dispute
The Austin Court of Appeals recently addressed the issue of mineral reservation in a deed in Ross v. Flower, offering important reminders for Texas landowners and property purchasers. Background This case revolves around the interpretation of a paragraph in a deed for 20-acres of land in Fayette County. In 1999, the Rosses owned the surface and mineral interests for the 20-acre tract at issue. In April 1999, the Rosses executed a General Warranty Deed conveying the property to Richard & Patricia Church. Specifically, the Deed stated that the… Read More →
Case Addresses Solar Lease, Mineral Owner, and the Accommodation Doctrine
The El Paso Court of Appeals addressed an interesting and important issue recently in Lyle v. Midway Solar. How does Texas law apply when there is a potential conflict between the operation of a large scale solar facility and the ability of the mineral owner to extract oil or gas? Background This dispute involves a 315-acre tract of land in Pecos County. The Lyles own 27.5% of the mineral rights to this land by virtue of a 1948 deed. There is no current mineral lease on the property, and the… Read More →
MT Supreme Court: Dinosaur Fossils Are Not Minerals
In an update to a story I included in the Weekly Round Up last Friday, the Montana Supreme Court has ruled on the question of whether dinosaur fossils are minerals under state law. [Read Opinion here.] Background The case involves farm and ranch land in Montana. The land was initially owned by the Seversons and for approximately 15 years, it was run as a partnership between the Seversons and the Murrays, who worked there as ranchers. In 2005, the Seversons severed the surface estate from the mineral estate. … Read More →
TX Supreme Court Addresses Duty of Executive Rights Holder
The Texas Supreme Court recently issued an opinion addressing the duty owed by an executive right holder to non-participating mineral owners. This is an important issue for both mineral owners and executive right holders to understand and be aware of when considering lease offers. Factual Background Dora Jo Carter owned 1,082 acres in Frio County. She and her two children also, collectively, owned 50% of the mineral estate. The other 50% mineral interest was owned by the Hindeses. In 2002, Mrs. Carter sold the surface estate to Texas… Read More →