Category Archives: Contracts

Important Reminders on Contract Interpretation from Texas Supreme Court

The Texas Supreme Court recently decided an interesting contract case involving an agreement to supply water for fracking in Equinor Energy v. Lindale Pipeline.  [Read Opinion here.] Background Fracking is a common method of oil and gas production in the United States.  It involves pumping water down a well into a formation under high pressure, causing the formation to crack open and the oil or gas to flow into the wellbore.  Fracking requires large amounts of water, and companies often contract with water suppliers to transport water to well… Read More →

Appellate Court Reverses Million Dollar Verdict in Dispute Over Wind Rights

The Amarillo Court of Appeals has reversed a $1.2 million jury award in a dispute over wind rights on land in Hale County. Background This lawsuit involves a dispute over who owns wind energy development rights on a 256-acre property in Hale County, Texas. Glendale King owned the land at issue.  In 2010, he entered into a Wind and Easement Lease Agreement with Hale County Wind Farm, LLC.  In that lease agreement, the property description was as follows: Glendale King – 100% All that real property located in… Read More →

New Fact Sheet: Key Legal Considerations for any Carbon-Related Agreement

We recently published a fact sheet on the key legal considerations producers and landowners should keep in mind before entering into any type of carbon-related agreement. The carbon market is changing and evolving, and it is critical to carefully review, analyze, and understand every term in an agreement.  As with many contracts, the cliche “the devil’s in the details” is often true with carbon-related agreements. This fact sheet walks through ten key issues everyone should consider before signing their name on the dotted line of a carbon agreement. … Read More →

FTC Bans Most Non-Compete Agreements

**UPDATE:  A federal court in Texas set aside this rule in August 2024 on a nationwide basis.  Read more here. On April 23, 2024 the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced its Final Non-Compete Clause Rule banning most non-compete clauses in the United States. The Rule is set to go into effect on September 4, 2024. What are Non-Compete Clauses? The Rule defines a non-compete clause as a term or condition of employment that prohibits a worker from, penalized a worker for, or functions to prevent a worker from:… Read More →

January 5, 2024 Weekly Round Up

Hello and Happy New Year!  We’re back with our first Ag Law Weekly Round Up of 2024.  Here are some of the biggest ag law stories in the news over the past few weeks. *State of Texas responds in Tofurkey lawsuit challenging meat labeling law.  You may recall our Thanksgiving blog post highlighted a lawsuit challenging Texas’ new labeling law requiring analogue, plant based, and cell-cultured meat to be labeled in the Lone Star State.  The State of Texas has now filed a Motion to Dismiss in that… Read More →

July 28, 2023 Weekly Round Up

We’ve reached the end of July!  Here are some of the ag law stories in the news. *Court rules that challenge to EPA dicamba registration brought by farm groups belongs in district court.  The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia recently ruled that a lawsuit filed by the American Soybean Association against the EPA should have been filed in the district court (trial level court) rather than at the court of appeals level.  Because of this, the court dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction…. Read More →

Thumbs Up Emoji Costs Canadian Farmer $82,000

A recent lawsuit involving a Canadian farmer and a “thumbs up emoji” has generated a good deal of media attention.  The court’s opinion in South West Terminal v. Achter Land & Cattle is an interesting look at contract law meeting new technology. Background South West Terminal (“SWT”) is a grain and crop input company.  Kent Mickleborough is a grain buyer for SWT.  Achter Land & Cattle (“the Farm”) is a farming operation owned by Chris Achter and his father, Bob. Since 2012, SWT purchased grain from the Farm through… Read More →

Neighbor-to-Neighbor Farm Sale Leads to Lawsuits

*NOTE:  In August 2023, the Amarillo Court of Appeals withdrew its initial opinion and issued a new Opinion in the case.  The outcome and most of the analysis was the same.  The only change was based on why the court dismissed the promissory estoppel claim.  The blog post has been edited to reflect the revised Opinion.* When a dispute arose related to a neighbor-to-neighbor farm sale, two lawsuits were filed.  The Amarillo Court of Appeals’ decisions in both Barkley v. Connelly cases offer important reminders for anyone entering into… Read More →

“If one asks why agreements should be memorialized in writing, this case illustrates why.”

“If one asks why agreements should be memorialized in writing, this case illustrates why.”   With an opening sentence like that, I knew I had to write a blog post about the Amarillo Court of Appeals’ decision in Kongvongsay v. Sayasane.  Although it is not related to agricultural property, the lessons learned are still important for all landowners, sellers, and purchasers. Background In September 2012, Sayasane and Kongvongsay entered into an oral agreement that Sayasane would buy a commercial building in Amarillo from Kongvongsay for $110,000.  Sayasane made a… Read More →

Case Addresses Requirements to Exercise Right of First Refusal

An El Paso Court of Appeals case, Mr. W Fireworks, Inc. v. NRZ Investment Group, LLC, offers important information for anyone seeking to exercise a right of first refusal. [Read opinion here.] (If you’ve been here for a while, you may remember this is not Mr. W’s first case this year involving problems with a right of first refusal.  Click here to read about a case in the Panhandle from last year.) Background  This case involves a lease between landowner, Nathan Lee, and Mr. W Fireworks, Inc. (“Mr…. Read More →