-
-
American Bar Association Web 100 Honoree
-
Texas Bar Today Top 10 Blog Posts
-
Tenth Anniversary Edition 100 BLAWG Honoree
-
Top 100 Blawg Winner 2015!
-
Top 100 Blawg Winner 2014!
-
View by Category
- "Ag Gag" Statutes
- AALA Conference
- Adverse Possession
- AQHA Cloning Lawsuit
- Big Data
- Business Entity Selection
- Carbon Contracts
- Checkoff Program Challenges
- Clean Water Act
- Contracts
- Dicamba
- Direct Beef Sales
- Dispute Resolution
- Drones
- Easements
- Eminent Domain
- Eminent Domain in Texas Series
- Employment/Labor Law
- Endangered Species Act
- Estate Planning
- Extension Publications
- Farm Animal Liability Act
- Farm Bill
- Federal Regulations
- Fence Law
- FOIA/PIA
- Food Safety
- Free Ag Law Resources
- GMO Labeling
- GMO Labeling and Reporting
- Greenwashing
- Hemp
- Horse Slaughter
- Immigration
- Insurance
- Land Values
- Landowner Liability
- Leases
- Lesser Prairie Chicken
- Lessons from My Agricultural Law Course
- Liens
- Local Fracking Bans
- Mental Health
- Oil and Gas Law
- Pesticide Drift
- Podcast
- Prescribed Burning
- Property Taxes
- Purchasing Property
- Questions from Tiffany's Desk
- Regulatory Takings
- Right to Farm laws
- SCOTUS Watch
- Seed Law
- Solar
- Special Use Valuation
- Surface Use Agreements
- Syngenta Litigation
- Tax Issues
- Texas Legislature
- Texas Supreme Court Decisions
- Texas Water Wars
- Transition Planning
- Uncategorized
- Undercover Video Situations
- United States Congress
- United States Supreme Court Decisions
- USDA Programs
- Water Law
- Water Pipeline Projects
- Weekly Round Up
- Wildfire
- Wind Energy Leasing
- WOTUS
- Year in Review
-
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
Category Archives: Contracts
FTC Bans Most Non-Compete Agreements
**UPDATE: A federal court in Texas set aside this rule in August 2024 on a nationwide basis. Read more here. On April 23, 2024 the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced its Final Non-Compete Clause Rule banning most non-compete clauses in the United States. The Rule is set to go into effect on September 4, 2024. What are Non-Compete Clauses? The Rule defines a non-compete clause as a term or condition of employment that prohibits a worker from, penalized a worker for, or functions to prevent a worker from:… Read More →
January 5, 2024 Weekly Round Up
Hello and Happy New Year! We’re back with our first Ag Law Weekly Round Up of 2024. Here are some of the biggest ag law stories in the news over the past few weeks. *State of Texas responds in Tofurkey lawsuit challenging meat labeling law. You may recall our Thanksgiving blog post highlighted a lawsuit challenging Texas’ new labeling law requiring analogue, plant based, and cell-cultured meat to be labeled in the Lone Star State. The State of Texas has now filed a Motion to Dismiss in that… Read More →
July 28, 2023 Weekly Round Up
We’ve reached the end of July! Here are some of the ag law stories in the news. *Court rules that challenge to EPA dicamba registration brought by farm groups belongs in district court. The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia recently ruled that a lawsuit filed by the American Soybean Association against the EPA should have been filed in the district court (trial level court) rather than at the court of appeals level. Because of this, the court dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction…. Read More →
Thumbs Up Emoji Costs Canadian Farmer $82,000
A recent lawsuit involving a Canadian farmer and a “thumbs up emoji” has generated a good deal of media attention. The court’s opinion in South West Terminal v. Achter Land & Cattle is an interesting look at contract law meeting new technology. Background South West Terminal (“SWT”) is a grain and crop input company. Kent Mickleborough is a grain buyer for SWT. Achter Land & Cattle (“the Farm”) is a farming operation owned by Chris Achter and his father, Bob. Since 2012, SWT purchased grain from the Farm through… Read More →
Neighbor-to-Neighbor Farm Sale Leads to Lawsuits
*NOTE: In August 2023, the Amarillo Court of Appeals withdrew its initial opinion and issued a new Opinion in the case. The outcome and most of the analysis was the same. The only change was based on why the court dismissed the promissory estoppel claim. The blog post has been edited to reflect the revised Opinion.* When a dispute arose related to a neighbor-to-neighbor farm sale, two lawsuits were filed. The Amarillo Court of Appeals’ decisions in both Barkley v. Connelly cases offer important reminders for anyone entering into… Read More →
“If one asks why agreements should be memorialized in writing, this case illustrates why.”
“If one asks why agreements should be memorialized in writing, this case illustrates why.” With an opening sentence like that, I knew I had to write a blog post about the Amarillo Court of Appeals’ decision in Kongvongsay v. Sayasane. Although it is not related to agricultural property, the lessons learned are still important for all landowners, sellers, and purchasers. Background In September 2012, Sayasane and Kongvongsay entered into an oral agreement that Sayasane would buy a commercial building in Amarillo from Kongvongsay for $110,000. Sayasane made a… Read More →
Case Addresses Requirements to Exercise Right of First Refusal
An El Paso Court of Appeals case, Mr. W Fireworks, Inc. v. NRZ Investment Group, LLC, offers important information for anyone seeking to exercise a right of first refusal. [Read opinion here.] (If you’ve been here for a while, you may remember this is not Mr. W’s first case this year involving problems with a right of first refusal. Click here to read about a case in the Panhandle from last year.) Background This case involves a lease between landowner, Nathan Lee, and Mr. W Fireworks, Inc. (“Mr…. Read More →
Case Explains Why Livestock Sales Contracts Should Be in Writing
The Texarkana Court of Appeals recently issued an opinion in Lee v. Jorgenson, which offers a critical reminder about the need to have all livestock sales contracts in writing. [Read opinion here.] Background Ralph Lee sold Waygu cattle to TJ’s Land and Cattle Company, LLC, (“the LLC”) of which Tom Jorgenson was a member. Lee alleges this was a “handshake deal” that was memorialized in a Cattle Purchase Agreement (“CPA”). The CPA was not signed by Jorgenson or anyone representing the LLC, but did include price terms for Waygu… Read More →
Case Offers Important Reminder that Real Estate Contracts Must Be in Writing
A recent Ft. Worth Court of Appeals case, In the Estate of Terry Lynn Banta, Deceased, offers an important reminder of why it is critical to have any contracts regarding the purchase of real estate in writing. [Read Opinion here.] Statute of Frauds This case revolves around the “statute of frauds.” Generally speaking, a verbal contract is enforceable under Texas law. There are certain types of contracts, however, that are required to be in writing to be legally enforceable pursuant to the statute of frauds. One such contract for which… Read More →
Rights of First Refusal and the Importance of Record Notice
A right of first refusal can be a good way to ensure a person has an option to purchase property before it is sold to another. However, as the Amarillo Court of Appeals recently considered in Mr. W. Fireworks, Inc. v. 731 Properties, LLC, certain steps must be taken to ensure enforceability of this right. [Read opinion here.] Background Mr. W Fireworks, Inc. (“Mr. W”) owns fireworks stands across Texas, New Mexico, and Oklahoma. One of its stands is on Soncy Road in Amarillo on land that it leased… Read More →