• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Texas A&M Forest Service
  • Texas A&M Veterinary Medical Diagnostics Laboratory
  • Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service
  • Texas A&M AgriLife Research
  • Texas A&M College of Agrculture and Life Sciences
Ag Economics on the Plains
Ag Economics on the Plains
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Useful Websites
  • Current Reports
  • Market Prices
  • Texas Auction Data
  • Published Resources
Home > Business Management > Input Costs in 2025

Input Costs in 2025

January 17, 2025 by andrew.wright

Picture of a stack of coinsAs we enter a new year, producers are making plans for a new crop.  Those plans will depend in part on their expectations regarding their costs of production.  In this post, we’ll discuss our expectations for five important costs in 2025.

 

 

Production Costs in the Texas A&M AgriLife Budgets

The main contributors to production costs in the Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Economics budgets are seed, fertilizer, chemicals, and fuel/energy.  We’ll focus on costs for those four inputs here.

Seed

Tables 1 and 2 report the average seed costs for corn, cotton, sorghum, and wheat as reported in the USDA ERS Commodity Costs and Returns surveys.  Over the five years reported here, seed costs increased an average of 6.1% year-over-year for the United States.  For the Prairie Gateway region, which contains the high plains and rolling plains, the average year-over-year increase is 6.8%.  Depending on the crop, it seems reasonable to expect anywhere from a 5% to 7% increase in seed costs this year.

Table showing seed costs in the United States

Table 1. Estimated Seed Costs for Selected Crops in the United States

 

Table showing estimated seed costs in the Prairie Gateway region

Table 2. Estimated Seed Costs for Selected Crops in the Prairie Gateway

Fertilizer

After reaching record-high prices in 2022, fertilizer prices fell throughout 2023 and 2024, as shown in Figure 1.  Whether this trend continues depends on three things.  First, the balance of global supply and demand.  For now, these forces appear to be in balance; there is neither an indication of major shortages nor surpluses of fertilizer.  However, Russia, China, and the Middle East are all major producers of fertilizer.  An escalation of the Russia-Ukraine war, the Israel-Iran conflict, or the China-Taiwan conflict would likely push prices up.  A second related factor to watch is the state of trade relationships between the United States and its global suppliers, including Russia and China.  Should the United States increase its trade restrictions (tariffs and sanctions) on these nations, fertilizer prices in the U.S. will likely face upward pressure.  Finally, we must keep the local supply and demand situation in mind.  Labor disputes and shortages in the transportation sector of the U.S. economy increase the cost of moving fertilizer from ports to local suppliers and put upward pressure on local prices.  Then, these suppliers may over- or understock their fertilizer supplies based on what they expect local demand to be.  A local shortage situation would put upward pressure on prices, while a local surplus would have the opposite effect.

This is all to say that there is a lot of uncertainty around fertilizer prices right now, both globally and locally.  Unless any of the major changes I’ve mentioned here occur, it’s reasonable to expect fertilizer prices to remain steady this year.  However, there seems to be more upward price pressure in the unknowns than there is downward pressure.

Graph of fertilizer prices over time

Figure 1. Retail Fertilizer Prices, 2022-2024

Chemicals

The chemicals story is like the one for fertilizer.  After reaching record-high prices in 2022, chemical prices fell throughout 2023.  Changes in prices as measured by the Producer Price Index (PPI) leveled off in September 2023 and have remained essentially unchanged since (Figure 2).  Based on this trend, it seems likely that chemical costs will remain stable this year unless a major shock occurs in the market.

Graph of ag chemical PPI

Figure 2. Producer Price Index: Agricultural and Commercial Pesticides and Chemicals, 2022-2024

Fuel/Energy

On-farm energy expenditures come primarily from three sources: energy used to pump water for irrigation, gasoline, and diesel fuel.  The current short-term energy outlook from the U.S. Energy Information Administration indicates that gasoline and diesel costs in 2025 will remain at or near their 2024 levels.  However, natural gas prices are expected to increase.  EIA predicts an average Henry Hub spot price of $3.10/MMBtu for natural gas in 2025, which is a $0.90 increase over the average 2024 price.  For gasoline and diesel fuel, EIA predicts average retail prices of $3.20/gal and $3.70/gal respectively.  Both these predictions reflect an expectation that fuel prices will decrease in 2025 compared to 204.

What About Interest Rates?

The Federal Reserve began to decrease interest rates in September of last year and has indicated it will continue to decrease rates in 2025.  The immediate impact of the Fed’s rate decrease on agricultural loan rates is illustrated in Figure 3.  Agricultural loan rates decreased by about 6% in the fourth quarter of 2024 compared to the third quarter.  Depending on how fast the Fed brings rates down this year, ag loan rates may end up somewhere in the low 8% or high 7% range this year.

Tips for Managing Costs

It looks like 2025 will be another year of high costs, low commodity prices, and tight margins.  For this reason, we encourage producers to make every effort to manage their input use to keep costs as low as possible.  I offer these suggestions for the year:

  1. Communicate your needs with your suppliers. Make sure your suppliers know your needs so that they manage their inventory well and so you avoid the local supply shortages that I mentioned earlier.
  2. Research the quality of any input you plan to use before you purchase it. One of the most important decisions you will make is the seed variety you plant.  Make sure you choose a variety that is right for your soil and production system.  For cotton producers in District 2, you can see the results of Ken Lege’s RACE trials on the Lubbock Research and Extension Center website.
  3. Consider the impact of your decisions on profitability, not yield. If boosting yield costs more than the market value of the extra production, you lose money.  If reducing costs means you lose more in revenue than you save, you lose money.  Make sure cost increases create larger revenue increases.  Make sure cost savings don’t result in larger revenue losses.

Filed Under: Business Management, Corn, Cotton, Crops, Risk Management, Sorghum, Uncategorized, Wheat

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Recent Posts

  • Grazing Management Plans: Planning for Pasture, Performance, and Profit
  • Changes to the ARC-CO Program in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act
  • Pasture, Rangeland, and Forage Insurance Deadline is Coming Soon

Recent Comments

    Categories

    • Ag Policy
    • Business Management
    • Carbon
    • Cattle
    • Cattle Prices
    • China
    • Corn
    • Cotton
    • COVID-19
    • Crops
    • Diaster Program
    • Drought
    • European Union
    • Food
    • Forage
    • Goats
    • Hemp
    • High Plains Ag Week
    • Impact of Agribusiness in the High Plains Trade Area
    • Livestock
    • Marketing Plan
    • Peanuts
    • Risk Management
    • Sheep
    • Sorghum
    • Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Resources
    • Trade
    • Uncategorized
    • USMCA
    • Wheat
    Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service
    Texas A&M University System Member
    • Compact with Texans
    • Privacy and Security
    • Accessibility Policy
    • State Link Policy
    • Statewide Search
    • Veterans Benefits
    • Military Families
    • Risk, Fraud & Misconduct Hotline
    • Texas Homeland Security
    • Texas Veteran's Portal
    • Equal Opportunity
    • Open Records/Public Information