{"id":969,"date":"2013-12-12T07:40:30","date_gmt":"2013-12-12T13:40:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/?p=969"},"modified":"2026-04-17T15:35:33","modified_gmt":"2026-04-17T20:35:33","slug":"update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2013\/12\/12\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\/","title":{"rendered":"Update to Breaking News: United States’ Brief in Texas v. New Mexico"},"content":{"rendered":"

**This article is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney.**<\/span><\/p>\n

As mentioned yesterday, the Solicitor General filed a brief in the Supreme Court case\u00a0between Texas and New Mexico.\u00a0\u00a0A copy of the brief can be found here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"shawna\"<\/a><\/p>\n

In the brief,\u00a0Solicitor General takes the position that the Court should grant Texas’ Motion and allow the complaint to be filed because Texas “alleges an interstate dispute of sufficient importance to warrant this Court’s exercise of its original jurisdiction…”\u00a0 Further, the Solicitor General believes that “Texas has adequately pled an injury to its sovereign rights under a reasonable interpretation of the Compact.”<\/p>\n

The brief goes on, however, to encourage the Court to allow for the parties to resolve potentially dispositive issues early on through a motion to dismiss, which “could significantly facilitate disposition of this controversy.”\u00a0 The approach advocated by the Solicitor General is to grant Texas’ motion to file a complaint, but prior to referring the case to a Special Master (the common next step in these type of cases) to allow New Mexico the chance to file a motion to dismiss to be decided by the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

Additionally, the Solicitor General\u00a0addressed the merits of Texas’ arguments, including agreeing with Texas that New Mexico’s obligation is not merely to deliver water to Elephant Butte and taking the position that New Mexico’s argument to that point would violate the intent and purpose of the Compact.\u00a0 “If New Mexico’s only obligation under the Compact were to deliver water to Elephant Butte, and if New Mexico were then free to allow depletions of the project water supply available below Elephant Butte, then Texas Bargained for little under the Compact.\u00a0 That view of the Compact is inconsistent with its basic purpose, which is to equitably apportion the water of the Rio Grande Basin–from its headwaters to Fort Quitman–among the three compacting states.”<\/p>\n

The ball is now in the hands of the United States Supreme Court, which will determine whether to grant Texas’ motion to file a complaint and hear the lawsuit.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

**This article is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney.** As mentioned yesterday, the Solicitor General filed a brief in the Supreme Court case\u00a0between Texas and New Mexico.\u00a0\u00a0A copy of the brief can be found here. In the brief,\u00a0Solicitor General takes the position that the Court should grant Texas’ Motion and allow the complaint to be filed because Texas “alleges an interstate dispute of sufficient importance to warrant this Court’s exercise of its original jurisdiction…”\u00a0 Further, the Solicitor General believes that “Texas has adequately pled an… Read More →<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2444,"featured_media":624,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-969","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-texas-water-wars"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nUpdate to Breaking News: United States' Brief in Texas v. New Mexico - Texas Agriculture Law<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2013\/12\/12\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Update to Breaking News: United States' Brief in Texas v. New Mexico - Texas Agriculture Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"**This article is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney.** As mentioned yesterday, the Solicitor General filed a brief in the Supreme Court case\u00a0between Texas and New Mexico.\u00a0\u00a0A copy of the brief can be found here. In the brief,\u00a0Solicitor General takes the position that the Court should grant Texas’ Motion and allow the complaint to be filed because Texas “alleges an interstate dispute of sufficient importance to warrant this Court’s exercise of its original jurisdiction…”\u00a0 Further, the Solicitor General believes that “Texas has adequately pled an... Read More →\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2013\/12\/12\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Texas Agriculture Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/texasaglaw\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-12-12T13:40:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-17T20:35:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/files\/2013\/10\/shawna.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1536\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2048\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"tiffany.dowell\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@tiffdowell\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@tiffdowell\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"tiffany.dowell\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":[\"Article\",\"BlogPosting\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2013\\\/12\\\/12\\\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2013\\\/12\\\/12\\\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"tiffany.dowell\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f44cbb97df9edaa18011b5258d733f73\"},\"headline\":\"Update to Breaking News: United States’ Brief in Texas v. New Mexico\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-12-12T13:40:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-17T20:35:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2013\\\/12\\\/12\\\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":357,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2013\\\/12\\\/12\\\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/files\\\/2013\\\/10\\\/shawna.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Texas Water Wars\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2013\\\/12\\\/12\\\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2013\\\/12\\\/12\\\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\\\/\",\"name\":\"Update to Breaking News: United States' Brief in Texas v. New Mexico - Texas Agriculture Law\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2013\\\/12\\\/12\\\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2013\\\/12\\\/12\\\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/files\\\/2013\\\/10\\\/shawna.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-12-12T13:40:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-17T20:35:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2013\\\/12\\\/12\\\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2013\\\/12\\\/12\\\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2013\\\/12\\\/12\\\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/files\\\/2013\\\/10\\\/shawna.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/files\\\/2013\\\/10\\\/shawna.jpg\",\"width\":1536,\"height\":2048},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2013\\\/12\\\/12\\\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Update to Breaking News: United States’ Brief in Texas v. New Mexico\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/\",\"name\":\"Texas Agriculture Law\",\"description\":\"Teaching, Research, Extension and Service\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Texas Agriculture Law\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/files\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/TZIFRg5K_400x400.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/files\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/TZIFRg5K_400x400.jpg\",\"width\":400,\"height\":400,\"caption\":\"Texas Agriculture Law\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/texasaglaw\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/tiffdowell\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/tiffany-dowell-lashmet-0a718778\\\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f44cbb97df9edaa18011b5258d733f73\",\"name\":\"tiffany.dowell\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/author\\\/tiffany-dowell\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Update to Breaking News: United States' Brief in Texas v. New Mexico - Texas Agriculture Law","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2013\/12\/12\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Update to Breaking News: United States' Brief in Texas v. New Mexico - Texas Agriculture Law","og_description":"**This article is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney.** As mentioned yesterday, the Solicitor General filed a brief in the Supreme Court case\u00a0between Texas and New Mexico.\u00a0\u00a0A copy of the brief can be found here. In the brief,\u00a0Solicitor General takes the position that the Court should grant Texas’ Motion and allow the complaint to be filed because Texas “alleges an interstate dispute of sufficient importance to warrant this Court’s exercise of its original jurisdiction…”\u00a0 Further, the Solicitor General believes that “Texas has adequately pled an... Read More →","og_url":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2013\/12\/12\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\/","og_site_name":"Texas Agriculture Law","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/texasaglaw","article_published_time":"2013-12-12T13:40:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-04-17T20:35:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1536,"height":2048,"url":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/files\/2013\/10\/shawna.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"tiffany.dowell","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@tiffdowell","twitter_site":"@tiffdowell","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"tiffany.dowell","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":["Article","BlogPosting"],"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2013\/12\/12\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2013\/12\/12\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\/"},"author":{"name":"tiffany.dowell","@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/#\/schema\/person\/f44cbb97df9edaa18011b5258d733f73"},"headline":"Update to Breaking News: United States’ Brief in Texas v. New Mexico","datePublished":"2013-12-12T13:40:30+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-17T20:35:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2013\/12\/12\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\/"},"wordCount":357,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2013\/12\/12\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/files\/2013\/10\/shawna.jpg","articleSection":["Texas Water Wars"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2013\/12\/12\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\/","url":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2013\/12\/12\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\/","name":"Update to Breaking News: United States' Brief in Texas v. New Mexico - Texas Agriculture Law","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2013\/12\/12\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2013\/12\/12\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/files\/2013\/10\/shawna.jpg","datePublished":"2013-12-12T13:40:30+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-17T20:35:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2013\/12\/12\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2013\/12\/12\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2013\/12\/12\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/files\/2013\/10\/shawna.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/files\/2013\/10\/shawna.jpg","width":1536,"height":2048},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2013\/12\/12\/update-to-breaking-news-united-states-brief-in-texas-v-new-mexico\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Update to Breaking News: United States’ Brief in Texas v. New Mexico"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/#website","url":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/","name":"Texas Agriculture Law","description":"Teaching, Research, Extension and Service","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/#organization","name":"Texas Agriculture Law","url":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/files\/2023\/12\/TZIFRg5K_400x400.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/files\/2023\/12\/TZIFRg5K_400x400.jpg","width":400,"height":400,"caption":"Texas Agriculture Law"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/texasaglaw","https:\/\/x.com\/tiffdowell","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/tiffany-dowell-lashmet-0a718778\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/#\/schema\/person\/f44cbb97df9edaa18011b5258d733f73","name":"tiffany.dowell","url":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/author\/tiffany-dowell\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/969","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2444"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=969"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/969\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/624"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=969"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=969"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=969"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}