{"id":3479,"date":"2015-12-15T02:11:59","date_gmt":"2015-12-15T08:11:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/?p=3479"},"modified":"2026-04-17T15:28:46","modified_gmt":"2026-04-17T20:28:46","slug":"2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2015\/12\/15\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\/","title":{"rendered":"2015 National Agriculture Law Year in Review (Part II)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Today we continue in our review of national agricultural law developments in 2015. \u00a0If you missed Part I of this series, click here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

EPA Revokes Approval for Suloxaflor and Enlist Duo.<\/strong> \u00a0Just a few weeks ago, the EPA announced it would revoke approval for suloxaflor (active ingredient in Transform) and withdraw its approval for the Enlist Duo. \u00a0Both were a result of litigation filed by environmental groups challenging the approval of these products. \u00a0Dow Chemical has stated it is confident that the EPA’s concerns can be addressed quickly and adequately.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Photo via Denton Dowell, Aurora Agronomy<\/p><\/div>\n

Draft drone regulations published by FAA.<\/strong>\u00a0 The Federal Aviation Administration published much anticipated draft regulations related to drone use in the United States.\u00a0 The regulations cover a variety of issues including operator qualifications, height, and visual requirements for drone operation.\u00a0\u00a0 These regulations, when finalized and enacted, will allow commercial drone use in the United States.\u00a0\u00a0 Currently drones may only be used for recreational or hobby use.\u00a0 Any commercial use of a drone requires a permit from the FAA.\u00a0 The draft rules were open for public comment and final rules should be forthcoming. \u00a0[Read prior post here<\/a>.]<\/p>\n

AQHA cloning suit reversed, registration not required.\u00a0 <\/strong>After losing at the trial court level, the American Quarter Horse Association scored a major victory on appeal when the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit found that the AQHA rule banning registration of cloned horses or their offspring did not violate the law. \u00a0The trial jury found that the AQHA policy prohibiting registration of clones violated the Sherman Anti-trust Act. \u00a0Earlier this year, however, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed. \u00a0 \u00a0 [Read prior post here<\/a>.]<\/p>\n

GMO production bans and labeling issues considered.<\/strong>\u00a0 The buzz over genetically modified organisms (GMOs) continued to increase during 2015.\u00a0 Several legal issues have arisen.\u00a0 Chief among these is a legal challenge to a Vermont law that will require labeling of all products containing GMO ingredients by 2016.\u00a0 Numerous plaintiffs, led by the Grocery Manufacturers Association, filed suit claiming the law violates the First Amendment, the Commerce Clause, and is pre-empted by federal law.\u00a0 In April, the court issued a ruling primarily in favor of Vermont, which is now on appeal.\u00a0 Although Connecticut and Maine have also passed such labeling laws, only the Vermont law has a set effective date, while the other states laws will become effective only once certain trigger conditions are met.\u00a0\u00a0 Another case arose in Hawaii, where a federal judge struck down a local law prohibiting farmers from growing any GMO crops in Maui County.\u00a0 Specifically, the court found this local law was pre-empted by state and federal laws on the topic. [Read prior posts here <\/a>and here<\/a>.]<\/p>\n

US Supreme Court sides with raisin farmers in takings case.<\/strong>\u00a0 It is not that common for a farmer to be before the United States Supreme Court, but California raising farmers and brokers not only appeared, but prevailed on their takings claim before the Court earlier this year.\u00a0 Under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act, the USDA sets a quota on the number of raisins that may be sold in the United States each year by requiring growers to give a certain percentage of their crop to the government.\u00a0 The surplus crop is then either destroyed, donated, or sold in non-competitive markets.\u00a0 The plaintiffs claimed that this marketing scheme resulted in a taking of their private property rights for which just compensation was owed.\u00a0 The high court agreed, ordering the USDA to compensate the growers the market value of the raisins at the time they were taken by the government.\u00a0 How broadly this decision will be applied, and whether it will impact any other price control laws is, for now, not clear. \u00a0[Read prior post here<\/a>.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Today we continue in our review of national agricultural law developments in 2015. \u00a0If you missed Part I of this series, click here. EPA Revokes Approval for Suloxaflor and Enlist Duo. \u00a0Just a few weeks ago, the EPA announced it would revoke approval for suloxaflor (active ingredient in Transform) and withdraw its approval for the Enlist Duo. \u00a0Both were a result of litigation filed by environmental groups challenging the approval of these products. \u00a0Dow Chemical has stated it is confident that the EPA’s concerns can be addressed quickly… Read More →<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2444,"featured_media":3539,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[46,10,34,49,5,23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3479","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-drones","category-federal-regulations","category-gmo-labeling-and-reporting","category-takings","category-united-states-supreme-court-decisions","category-year-in-review"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n2015 National Agriculture Law Year in Review (Part II) - Texas Agriculture Law<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2015\/12\/15\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2015 National Agriculture Law Year in Review (Part II) - Texas Agriculture Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Today we continue in our review of national agricultural law developments in 2015. \u00a0If you missed Part I of this series, click here. EPA Revokes Approval for Suloxaflor and Enlist Duo. \u00a0Just a few weeks ago, the EPA announced it would revoke approval for suloxaflor (active ingredient in Transform) and withdraw its approval for the Enlist Duo. \u00a0Both were a result of litigation filed by environmental groups challenging the approval of these products. \u00a0Dow Chemical has stated it is confident that the EPA’s concerns can be addressed quickly... Read More →\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2015\/12\/15\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Texas Agriculture Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/texasaglaw\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-12-15T08:11:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-17T20:28:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/files\/2015\/12\/Plane.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"862\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"895\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"tiffany.dowell\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@tiffdowell\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@tiffdowell\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"tiffany.dowell\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":[\"Article\",\"BlogPosting\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/15\\\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/15\\\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"tiffany.dowell\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f44cbb97df9edaa18011b5258d733f73\"},\"headline\":\"2015 National Agriculture Law Year in Review (Part II)\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-12-15T08:11:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-17T20:28:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/15\\\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":636,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/15\\\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/files\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/Plane.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Drones\",\"Federal Regulations\",\"GMO Labeling and Reporting\",\"Regulatory Takings\",\"United States Supreme Court Decisions\",\"Year in Review\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/15\\\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/15\\\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\\\/\",\"name\":\"2015 National Agriculture Law Year in Review (Part II) - Texas Agriculture Law\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/15\\\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/15\\\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/files\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/Plane.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-12-15T08:11:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-17T20:28:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/15\\\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/15\\\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/15\\\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/files\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/Plane.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/files\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/Plane.jpg\",\"width\":862,\"height\":895},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/15\\\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2015 National Agriculture Law Year in Review (Part II)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/\",\"name\":\"Texas Agriculture Law\",\"description\":\"Teaching, Research, Extension and Service\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Texas Agriculture Law\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/files\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/TZIFRg5K_400x400.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/files\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/TZIFRg5K_400x400.jpg\",\"width\":400,\"height\":400,\"caption\":\"Texas Agriculture Law\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/texasaglaw\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/tiffdowell\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/tiffany-dowell-lashmet-0a718778\\\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f44cbb97df9edaa18011b5258d733f73\",\"name\":\"tiffany.dowell\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/agrilife.org\\\/texasaglaw\\\/author\\\/tiffany-dowell\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2015 National Agriculture Law Year in Review (Part II) - Texas Agriculture Law","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2015\/12\/15\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2015 National Agriculture Law Year in Review (Part II) - Texas Agriculture Law","og_description":"Today we continue in our review of national agricultural law developments in 2015. \u00a0If you missed Part I of this series, click here. EPA Revokes Approval for Suloxaflor and Enlist Duo. \u00a0Just a few weeks ago, the EPA announced it would revoke approval for suloxaflor (active ingredient in Transform) and withdraw its approval for the Enlist Duo. \u00a0Both were a result of litigation filed by environmental groups challenging the approval of these products. \u00a0Dow Chemical has stated it is confident that the EPA’s concerns can be addressed quickly... Read More →","og_url":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2015\/12\/15\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\/","og_site_name":"Texas Agriculture Law","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/texasaglaw","article_published_time":"2015-12-15T08:11:59+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-04-17T20:28:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":862,"height":895,"url":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/files\/2015\/12\/Plane.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"tiffany.dowell","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@tiffdowell","twitter_site":"@tiffdowell","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"tiffany.dowell","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":["Article","BlogPosting"],"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2015\/12\/15\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2015\/12\/15\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\/"},"author":{"name":"tiffany.dowell","@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/#\/schema\/person\/f44cbb97df9edaa18011b5258d733f73"},"headline":"2015 National Agriculture Law Year in Review (Part II)","datePublished":"2015-12-15T08:11:59+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-17T20:28:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2015\/12\/15\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\/"},"wordCount":636,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2015\/12\/15\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/files\/2015\/12\/Plane.jpg","articleSection":["Drones","Federal Regulations","GMO Labeling and Reporting","Regulatory Takings","United States Supreme Court Decisions","Year in Review"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2015\/12\/15\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\/","url":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2015\/12\/15\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\/","name":"2015 National Agriculture Law Year in Review (Part II) - Texas Agriculture Law","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2015\/12\/15\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2015\/12\/15\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/files\/2015\/12\/Plane.jpg","datePublished":"2015-12-15T08:11:59+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-17T20:28:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2015\/12\/15\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2015\/12\/15\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2015\/12\/15\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/files\/2015\/12\/Plane.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/files\/2015\/12\/Plane.jpg","width":862,"height":895},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/2015\/12\/15\/2015-national-agriculture-law-year-in-review-part-ii\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2015 National Agriculture Law Year in Review (Part II)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/#website","url":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/","name":"Texas Agriculture Law","description":"Teaching, Research, Extension and Service","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/#organization","name":"Texas Agriculture Law","url":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/files\/2023\/12\/TZIFRg5K_400x400.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/files\/2023\/12\/TZIFRg5K_400x400.jpg","width":400,"height":400,"caption":"Texas Agriculture Law"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/texasaglaw","https:\/\/x.com\/tiffdowell","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/tiffany-dowell-lashmet-0a718778\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/#\/schema\/person\/f44cbb97df9edaa18011b5258d733f73","name":"tiffany.dowell","url":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/author\/tiffany-dowell\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3479","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2444"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3479"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3479\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3539"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3479"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3479"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/agrilife.org\/texasaglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3479"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}